For investors, legal experts, and diplomats alike, the decision to incorporate this mechanism reflects the treaty’s focus on attracting foreign investment while addressing concerns over policy stability. However, ISDS clauses are not without controversy, given their potential to impact government autonomy and create financial liabilities in investor disputes.

For advisors and investors, understanding the mechanics, historical context, and implications of ISDS is critical. This article dissects the mechanisms of ISDS, its historical trends, and sectors most likely to leverage it. Additionally, we offer actionable tips to help you prepare to mitigate treaty-related risks.

What is ISDS, and how does it work?

ISDS provisions allow investors to sue governments at specialised arbitration tribunals if public policies or regulatory changes significantly harm their investments. These settlements do not go through domestic courts but instead rely on arbitral rules such as those stipulated by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) or the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The mechanism aims to prevent retaliatory measures, ensure neutrality, and provide protection against unfair practices like nationalisation or discriminatory policies.

Here’s how the process typically works:

Filing a Claim

The investor initiates arbitration by submitting a notice of dispute. Grounds could range from sudden regulatory changes to perceived breaches of fair treatment.

Arbitration Panel

A panel of independent arbitrators is appointed, with each side nominating one arbitrator and a third party selected as the chairperson.

Ruling & Awards

The tribunal assesses the case based on the treaty in question, delivering binding decisions. Typical rulings involve compensation for affected investments, with awards often reaching millions or even billions of dollars.

For example, in Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) cases, energy firms have seen awards upwards of $50 billion, as with the landmark Yukos case against Russia. Other high-profile rulings have included mining and infrastructure disputes, illustrating ISDS’s weighty financial stakes.

Why is this UK-India treaty significant?

The inclusion of ISDS in the UK-India treaty will be closely watched, given the UK’s recent reluctance to adopt ISDS in post-Brexit deals. Notably, ISDS was excluded from the UK’s trade agreements with countries like Australia and New Zealand, as the British government prioritised flexibility in regulating sectors such as environmental policy. By reintroducing ISDS in its treaty with India, the UK signals a strategic shift designed to catalyse investments in an emerging economy while responding to demands for investor security.

On the Indian side, this treaty aligns with the Modi government’s efforts to improve India’s investment climate. India previously terminated or renegotiated BITs with over 50 countries, preferring domestic legal frameworks over international arbitration. However, this treaty reflects an understanding of how ISDS can attract institutional investors and corporations wary of bureaucratic or policy uncertainties.

This development speaks volumes when viewed alongside broader trade and investment landscapes:

CPTPP Membership

The UK’s accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) earlier this year underscores its willingness to re-engage with multilateral trade ecosystems that include ISDS provisions.

China’s Influence

China, a key stakeholder in the Indo-Pacific, continues to pursue investment treaties with carefully crafted ISDS clauses. Its negotiations, including the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI), shed light on how large economies are balancing investment protections with regulatory autonomy.

Sectors most likely to invoke ISDS

Certain sectors are more prone to investment disputes due to their dependency on regulatory frameworks, resource access, and long-term project feasibility. Below are the three sectors where ISDS activity is likely to be most pronounced under the UK-India treaty:

Energy

Energy firms make substantial investments in capital-intensive projects that often span decades. Changes in tariffs, resource-sharing agreements, or environmental laws could lead investors in the energy sector to seek legal recourse.

Infrastructure

Infrastructure investments tied to urban development, transport, and utilities frequently depend on public-private partnerships (PPPs). Unilateral changes to PPP contracts or licensing agreements in the face of election cycles can trigger significant disputes under ISDS clauses.

Mining

Mining companies operate in highly regulated environments, often exposed to expropriation risks or sudden export restrictions. ISDS provides a critical buffer when regulatory overhauls or new taxation structures threaten profitability.

Actionable tips for managing treaty-linked risks

With the UK-India BIT expected to be ratified soon, businesses and investors alike must position themselves to mitigate unforeseen risks. Here are two actionable strategies to manage ISDS-related uncertainties:

1. Assess arbitration-risk premiums in bond spreads

ISDS claims often arise in environments of heightened regulatory uncertainty, which can impact an issuer’s creditworthiness. Investors with exposure to sovereign or corporate bonds in India should monitor arbitration-risk premiums in bond spreads by tracking yield differentials for bonds issued by entities vulnerable to ISDS disputes.

2. Use ISDS-hedged fund wrappers

For portfolio managers, ISDS-hedged fund wrappers allocate diversified investments across several regions or sectors to minimise exposure to single-jurisdiction disputes. Innovative funds incorporate outcome tracking of arbitration cases to further manage downside risks.

Stay ahead with treaty scorecards from Advisor’s Gateway

For financial advisors and investment professionals, understanding how treaties like the UK-India BIT unfold is integral to navigating today’s global markets. The inclusion of ISDS raises new challenges and opportunities for corporate deal-making.

Advisor’s Gateway subscribers gain exclusive early access to comprehensive treaty-analysis scorecards, providing actionable insights tailored for treaty-risk management. Want to stay ahead of global policy shifts? Subscribe to our fortnightly newsletter today for priority access to treaty-risk insights.