The proposal, which has garnered support from major players in the energy, manufacturing, and financial sectors, is seen as a strategic move to enhance market efficiency, reduce compliance costs, and drive innovation in low-carbon technologies. However, the path to achieving this alignment is fraught with political complexities and economic considerations.

The Case for ETS Alignment and Price Convergence

Support for linking the UK’s ETS with the EU’s stems from a shared objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions while fostering economic competitiveness. The UK ETS, established post-Brexit, operates independently from the EU ETS, which is the world’s largest carbon market. Industry groups argue that maintaining two separate systems creates inefficiencies, particularly for companies operating across both regions, and could hamper progress toward net-zero targets.

Linkage would enable the two systems to function as a single market, facilitating trade of allowances across borders and promoting price convergence. This could provide greater price stability for carbon allowances, reducing uncertainty for businesses. The price of carbon in the EU ETS has averaged approximately €90 per tonne in 2024; meanwhile, the UK ETS has witnessed greater price volatility, fluctuating between £75 and £115 per tonne over the same period. A linked market could harmonise these prices, aiding industries in both regions to plan their emissions reduction strategies with greater confidence.

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and major EU trade associations highlight additional benefits of linkage, including reduced administration costs for multinational operators and more consistent incentives for investment in clean technologies. Furthermore, a linked system could amplify the effectiveness of carbon pricing as a tool for driving emissions reductions on a regional scale, aligned with both the EU’s Fit for 55 strategy and the UK's legally binding net-zero targets.

Political and Regulatory Barriers

Despite these potential advantages, significant political and regulatory hurdles stand in the way of linking the two systems. Since Brexit, there has been hesitation on both sides to integrate policy frameworks, particularly in areas perceived as markers of sovereignty. The UK’s departure from the EU’s Single Market and Customs Union included a clear intent to establish independent regulatory regimes, and the ETS has become a key symbol of this autonomy.

On the EU side, policymakers have expressed concerns over market compatibility. The EU ETS operates with stringent monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) standards, and there are questions regarding whether the UK ETS's rules meet these benchmarks. Any agreement on linkage would likely involve negotiations to ensure alignment on technical, operational, and environmental grounds.

The revision cycles for both systems present an additional challenge. The EU is in the process of updating its ETS under the Green Deal to cover emissions from maritime transport, while the UK has launched consultations on expanding its ETS to include waste incineration. Alignment would require careful coordination of these updates to ensure compatibility without causing market disruptions.

Political tensions also risk complicating the issue further. Frictions over Northern Ireland Protocol negotiations and trade tariffs have underscored the fragile state of UK-EU relations, raising concerns that ETS linkage might become embroiled in broader geopolitical disputes. Even with industry support, achieving an agreement will require strong political will from both sides to prioritise climate collaboration over political division.

Stocks to Watch in a Linked Market

A unified carbon market would create new opportunities across a range of industries, particularly for companies well-positioned to thrive in a carbon-constrained economy. Investors may consider sectors that stand to benefit from higher and harmonised carbon prices, such as utilities, renewable energy, and carbon capture technology.

1. Utilities

Integrated utilities with substantial renewable portfolios are likely to benefit from greater carbon price stability and convergence. For instance, RWE, headquartered in Germany, and SSE, based in the UK, are both leaders in renewable generation and could see a boost to profitability under a linked ETS. Their ability to generate emissions-free electricity aligns with the broader goals of decarbonisation, making them attractive investment opportunities.

2. Carbon Capture

Companies specialising in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies could experience increased demand as industries look for ways to offset emissions. Aker Carbon Capture, a leading CCS player, is positioned to benefit from higher carbon prices incentivising the implementation of capture projects.

3. Renewable Energy Technology

Providers of wind, solar, and energy storage technologies would stand to gain from higher carbon pricing pushing demand for low-carbon energy solutions. Vestas Wind Systems, a Danish wind turbine manufacturer, and ITM Power, a UK-based hydrogen specialist, are strong candidates to capitalise on these trends.

Actionable Clean-Energy Allocation Ideas

Whether or not the UK and EU ETS systems are eventually linked, the trajectory toward decarbonisation remains clear. Here are three actionable ideas to position investment portfolios for clean-energy opportunities:

• Diversify Across Renewable Energy Assets

Allocate funds to renewable energy infrastructure through green ETFs or direct investment in renewable energy companies. This approach offers the potential for stable returns while supporting the ongoing energy transition.

• Explore Carbon-Tech Innovations

Include companies at the forefront of technological solutions for emissions reduction, such as carbon capture, utilisation, and storage (CCUS), as the demand for these technologies is set to rise in a carbon-constrained future.

• Focus on Sustainability Leaders

Prioritise investments in companies with strong environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, as these organisations are often better equipped to adapt to changing regulatory landscapes and carbon pricing mechanisms.

For tailored insights on carbon strategy and allocation ideas, subscribe to Advisor’s Gateway’s fortnightly newsletter. With exclusive access to our carbon-strategy dashboards, you’ll stay ahead of the curve and well-informed as the carbon market evolves.